Differences in Organoleptic Quality and Nutritional Value of Profile of Tuna Fish Floss with Addition of Jackfruit Dami as an Alternative Source of Protein and Fiber: Perbedaan Mutu Organoleptik dan Profil Nilai Gizi Pada Abon Ikan Tuna Dengan Penambahan Dami Nangka Sebagai Alternatif Sumber Protein dan Serat

Rahmatullah Farid Azis; Jumiyati Jumiyati; Risda Yulianti

doi:10.33061/jitipari.v9i2.10763

Authors

Rahmatullah Farid Azis Poltekkes Kemenkes Bengkulu
Jumiyati Jumiyati Poltekkes Kemenkes Bengkulu
Risda Yulianti Poltekkes Kemenkes Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33061/jitipari.v9i2.10763

Abstract

Fish floss is a processed fishery product made from fresh fish as raw material in the form of powder or fiber from fish meat. The seasoning given has a brownish color which goes through boiling, steaming, shredding, adding spices and the cooking process. Jackfruit dami contains 1.94% crude fiber. Due to its high fiber content, Dami jackfruit has the potential to be processed into food products and is a good source of fiber in making shredded meat. This research aims to determine the differences in organoleptic hedonic tests and hedonic quality and nutritional value profile of tuna fish floss with the addition of jackfruit dami as an alternative source of protein and fiber. The design used was a completely randomized design with 3 different treatments between tuna (gr) and jackfruit dami (gr) F1 (75:25), F2 (50:50), and F3 (25:75). The results of this study showed that the F2 treatment had a level of preference for color (3.93), taste (3.67), texture (3.63), aroma (3.63), and overall (3.67). Color, texture and overall have significant differences in panelists' preferences, but the aroma and taste aspects are not significant in panelists' preferences. The best treatment, F2, has a water content of 7.08%, protein content of 48.1%, and fiber content of 3.50%.

References

Amertaningtyas, D., Padaga, M. C., Sawitri, M. E., & Awwaly, K. U. (2010). Kualitas organoleptik (kerenyahan dan rasa) kerupuk rambak kulit kelinci pada teknik buang bulu yang berbeda. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Hasil Ternak, 5(1), 18–22.

Ayu, D. fortuna, Sormin, D. sari, & Rahmayuni. (2020). Karakteristik mutu dan sensori nugget ikan patin (Pangasius hypopthalmus) dan nangka (Artocarpus heterophyllus) muda. Jurnal Teknologi dan Industri Pertanian Indonesia, 12(2), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.17969/jtipi.v12i2.15638

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2019). SNI 7690:2019 Abon ikan, krustasea atau moluska.

Bonisya, C., Nopriantini, & Hariyadi, D. (2018). Hubungan terhadap kadar serat dan daya terima abon ikan nila merah (Oeochromis niloticus). Pontianak Nutrition Journal, 1996, 15–19. http://ejournal.poltekkes-pontianak.ac.id/index.php/PNJ

Cintia, M. (2018). Diseminasi formulasi terbaik pembuatan abon ikan pelagis (studi kasus di ukm katamer, rajegwesi). Universitas Brawijaya.

Fitrayania, N. sri, Simarmataa, R. Y., Hendriyato, Y., Azkia, F. irdini, & Wijaya, M. Q. A. (2021). Penetapan kadar serat kasar metode gravimetri.

Gaga, L., Tahir, M., & Antuli, Z. (2022). Pengaruh lama pemasakan terhadap karakteristik fisikokimia abon ikan gabus (Channa striata) dengan substitusi jantung pisang. Jambura Journal of Food Technology, 4(1), 45–63.

Hiariey, S., & Karuwal, J. (2023). The influence of fish types on the organoleptic acceptance of fish shredded. Jurnal Perikanan, 13(3), 674–681. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.29303/jp.v13i3.600

Monica, L., Giriwono, P. edi, & Rimbawan. (2018). Pengembangan mi kering berbahan dasar tepung ubi jalar ungu (Ipomoea batatas l.) sebagai pangan fungsional tinggi serat development of dry noodle using purple sweet potato flour (Ipomoea batatas l.) as high fiber functional food. Jurnal Mutu Pangan, 5(1), 17–24. http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/87647

Nadia, L. (2010). Analisis kadar air bahan pangan. www.ut.ac.id

Nurmiah, S., Rusli, A., Amalya, R., & Fitriani, F. (2022). Mutu abon kerang darah (Anadara granosa) dengan dami nangka sebagai bahan pengisi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Pangkajene Kepulauan, 3, 312–321. https://doi.org/10.51978/proppnp.v3i1.254

Pakerti, A. luhur, & Purnama, R. candra. (2022). Analysis of protein levels in corn (Zea mays L.) purchased with brand l in the market region of semuli jaya lampung utara with using the kjeldahl method. Jurnal Analis Farmasi, 7(2), 119–129.

Pramudito, Mustika, A., & Rachim, F. (2022). Dami jackfruit : can it be made into jackfruit - floss ? International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7(7), 904–908.

Primasoni, N. (2022). Manfaat Protein untuk Mendukung Aktifitas Olahraga, Pertumbuhan, dan Perkembangan Anak Usia Dini.

Salman, Y., Syainah, E., & Helmina. (2020). Pengaruh proporsi daging ayam (Gallus gallus) dan jantung pisang (Musa paradisiaca) terhadap kadar protein, kadar serat, kadar air dan daya terima pada abon. Jurnal Kesehatan Indonesia, 6(1), 1–9.

Sulistiyati, T. D., Tambunan, J. E., Suprayitno, E., Budi, B., Chamidah, A., Alfanov, M., Panjaitan, P., Djamaludin, H., Frida, H., Putri, N., Rifka, Z., Kusuma, A., Technology, F. P., Science, M., Brawijaya, U., & Pisang, J. (2022). Karakteristik organoleptik abon ikan tuna (Thunnus sp.) dengan penambahan jantung pisang. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Research, 6(1), 10–19.

Surgawi, A. W., Sirajuddin, S., Jafar, N., Syam, A., & Battung, S. M. (2020). Produksi dan analisis daya terima abon ikan layang sebagai pangan fungsional. Jurnal Gizi Masyarakat Indonesia: The Journal of Indonesian Community Nutrition, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30597/jgmi.v9i1.10120

Wahyuni, S., Ukthy, N., Akbardiansyah, & Fitriani. (2023). Analisis perubahan nilai gizi selama proses pembuatan abon ikan tuna (Thunus sp) di koperasi aceh food jelly. Journal Fish Protech, 6(2), 92–97.

Wahyuningtias, S. I., Ruhana, A., Pangesthi, L. T., & Rohmadhoni, I. F. (2022). Pemanfaatan tepung jerami nangka (Artocarpus heterphullus) sebagai bahan substitusi pada kue kering nastar. Jurnal Tata Boga, 11(2), 64–70. https://www.kopertis7.go.id/uploadjurnal/3_SaintekV15No2Des2018.pdf