THE LAXITY OF CRIMINAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IN INDONESIA AND EFFORTS TO OVERCOME IT

Authors

  • Bambang Ali Kusumo Fakultas Hukum Universitas Slamet Riyadi Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v27i1.3843

Keywords:

civil law culture, Laxity, Surveillance Function

Abstract

The laxity of criminal law enforcement lied in the surveillance function in criminal justice management system and civil law culture. Effort needed to be done by empowering functions of broader Supreme Court surveillance, not only surveillance that proceeding in the court but also surveillance from all criminal law enforcement process. Beside that for the sake of actualizing justice in the society, civil law culture required to be used broad interpretation and always updated legal reform.

References

Sudarto. 1986. Hukum Dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Sutiyoso, Bambang. 2009. Metode Penemuan Hukum. Yogyakarta: UII. Press.

Criminal Code Advocacy. Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat (ELSAM).

The Main Judicial Authority Constitution (Constitution Number 48 Year 2009).

Constitution Number 2 Year 2002 as regards of Indonesia Republic State of Constabulary.

Constitution Number 16 Year 2004 as regards ofAttorney Indonesia Republic.

Constituent Number 18 Year 2003 as a regards of Advocacy.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-28

How to Cite

Kusumo, B. A. (2021). THE LAXITY OF CRIMINAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IN INDONESIA AND EFFORTS TO OVERCOME IT. Wacana Hukum, 27(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v27i1.3843

Issue

Section

Journal's Articles