PERGESERAN PRINSIP HAKIM PASIF KE AKTIF PADA PRAKTEK PERADILAN PERDATA PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF

Authors

  • Rian Saputra Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v25i1.2750

Keywords:

Progressive Law, Shifting Principles, Civil Judges.

Abstract

This article aims to find out the views of progressive law regarding the shift in the principle of judges to civil justice. M. Yahya Harahap, described this as a symptom of the emergence of a new flow in the realm of civil procedural law that tried to oppose the idea of a total passive judge by trying to introduce the principle of an argumentative active judge. One form of activeness of judges in civil courts is the decision of a judge to judge a case that is not prosecuted or decide beyond what is requested (Ultra Petita Principle). Based on the provisions of Article 178 paragraph (3) HIR and Article 189 paragraph (3), the RBg petita Ultra is prohibited, so that the factie violating ultra petita is considered as an act that exceeds authority. This article uses normative research. This article explains the view of progressive law regarding the shift in principle to civil judges, namely the shift is appropriate, if it aims to seek justice for the parties to the dispute.



References

Apeldoorn, L.J.Van, 2005, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta Pradnya Paramita.

Hamid, A.T., 1986, Hukum Acara Perdata Serta Susunan dan Kekuasaan Pengadilan, Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.

Harahap, Krisna, 2007, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia (Mediasi, Class Action, Arbitrase & Altenatif), Bandung: Gratfiti Budi Utami.

Harahap, M. Yahya, 2005, Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, Putusan Pengadilan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Kristiana, Yudi, 2015, Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Perpektif Hukum Progresif, Yogjakarta: Thafa Media.

Manan, Abdul, 2006, Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: Kencana.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, 2006, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Rahardjo, Satjipto, 2012, Hukum Progresif Sebagai Dasar Pembangunan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia, Semarang: Pustaka IAIN Walisongo Bekerjasama Dengan Program Doktor Undip.

Subagyono, Bambang Sugeng Ariadi, Johan Wahyudi, Razky Akbar, “Kajian Penerapan Asas Ultra Petita Pada Petitum Ex Aequo Et Bonoâ€, Yuridika: Volume 29 No 1, Januari - April 2014.

Sunarto, 2012, “Prinsip Hakim Aktif dalam Perkara Perdataâ€, Disertasi, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga,Surabaya.

Sunusi, Muh. Daming, 2009, “Fungsi Hakim Sebagai Sumber Pembentuk Hukum dalam Perkara Perdata Dihubungkan dengan Asas Peradilan Yang Baikâ€, Disertasi, Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung.

Sutiyoso, Bambang dan Sri Hastuti Puspitasari, 2005, Aspek-Aspek Perkembangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Wardah, Sri Dan Bambang Sutiyoso, 2007, Hukum Acara Perdata dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Gama Media.

Wijayanta, Tata, dkk, “Penerapan Prinsip Hakim Pasif dan Aktif Serta Relevansinya Terhadap Konsep Kebenaran Formalâ€, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Volume 22, Nomor 3, Oktober 2010.

Published

2019-05-25

How to Cite

Saputra, R. (2019). PERGESERAN PRINSIP HAKIM PASIF KE AKTIF PADA PRAKTEK PERADILAN PERDATA PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF. Wacana Hukum, 25(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v25i1.2750

Issue

Section

Journal's Articles