LIMITATION OF ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY OF RELIGIOUS COURTS AND DISTRICT COURTS IN SETTLEMENT OF INHERITANCE DISPUTES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v28i2.7705Keywords:
Religious Courts, District Courts, InheritanceAbstract
The absolute authority of the Religious Courts can be seen from Law Number 7 of 1989 in conjunction with Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning Religious Courts. Meanwhile, the District Court has the authority to examine, hear, and decide criminal and civil cases at the first level. Both the Religious Courts and the District Courts are authorized to settle inheritance disputes. Law No. 3 of 2006 concerning the Religious Courts states that for Muslims, the institution to settle inheritance cases is the Religious Courts. Meanwhile, non-Muslims can apply for dispute resolution to the District Court. However, the absolute authority of the Religious Courts still gives Muslim people a choice of law to choose what law to use in resolving inheritance disputes occurred which gives the potential to cause a conflict of authority between the two judicial institutions. Therefore, this conlifct must be resolved in order to create legal certainty
References
Asikin, Z. (2015). Hukum Acara perdata di Indonesia (III). Prenadamedia Group.
Budiman, D. K. (2020). Sengketa Warisan Perusahaan Perorangan Berubah Menjadi Perusahaan Berbadan Hukum. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 5(2), 198. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i2.188
Hadrian, E., & Hakim, L. (2020). Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia: Permasalahan Eksekusi Dan Mediasi (I). Deepublish Publisher.
Kamilah, A., & Rendy, M. (2015). Tidak Dilaksanakannya Wasiat oleh Ahli Waris Dihubungkan dengan Buku II Kitab Undang-Undang. 32(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v32i1.87
Khisni, H. A. (2011). Peradilan Agama Sebagai Peradilan Keluarga Serta Perkembangan Studi Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, XXV(1), 490. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v25i1.206
Komariah, U. (2014). Penyelesaian Sengketa Wakaf di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 23(3), 117–126. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.3.2.2014.117-126
Latifiani, D. (2015). Permasalahan Pelaksanaan Putusan Hakim. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 1(1), 16.
Latifiani, D., Widyawati, A., Fibrianti, N., & Ningsih, A. S. (2020). Advocate as Law Enforcer in the Implementation of E-Court. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(4), 439–449.
Maksum, H. (2020). Batasan Kewenangan Mengadili Pengadilan Umum dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yang Melibatkan Badan Negara atau Pejabat Pemerintah Ditinjau dari PERMA Nomor 2 Tahun 2019. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani, 2(November). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46601/juridica.v2i1.178
Maryono, A. S. (2019). Dualisme Kompetensi Permohonan Pengangkatan Anak Bagi yang Beragama Islam. ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 4(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v4i2.78
Memi, C. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kompetensi Absolut Antara Arbitrase Dan Pengadilan. Jurnal Yudisial, 10(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v10i2.142
Noviandi, F. (2021). Gugatan Cerai Maell Lee Dianggap Tak Memenuhi Syarat.
Novitasari, C. N., Latifiani, D., & Arifin, R. (2019). Analisis Hukum Islam terhadap Faktor Putusnya Tali Perkawinan. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 3(2), 322–341. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v3i2.4441
Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, I., & Said, M. Y. (2021). Metodologi Normatif dan Empiris dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14
Raja Guk-guk, D. G. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan sebagai Faktor Penyebab Tidak Dapat Diterimanya Gugatan (Studi Kasus Putusan NO 150/PDT.G/2016/PN LBP) (Issue 150). Universitas Medan Area.
Rochman, F. (2017). Peran Pengadilan Negeri Dalam Sengketa Harta Waris Orang Islam Pasca Putusan MA NO. 287 K/AG/2012. Www.Pn-Sumedang.Go.Id.
Soeroso, R. (2010). Hukum Acara Perdata Lengkap dan Praktis: HIR, RBg, dan Yurisprudensi (L. Wulandari (ed.); I). Sinar Grafika.
Thohari, I. (2015). Konflik Kewenangan Antara Pengadilan Negeri Dan Pengadilan Agama Dalam Menangai Perkara Sengketa Waris Orang Islam. Universum, 9(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.30762/universum.v9i2.84
Wahyunadi, Y. M. (2016). Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Konteks Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Ptun-Jakarta.Go.Id.
Yuniar, V. S., Sulistyanti, J. S., & Latifiani, D. (2021). The Court Role in Providing E-court System Education to Community : Post-Enactment of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019. UNIFIKASI : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 08(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v8i1.3697
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Alviona Anggita Rante Lembang, Natanael Andra Jaya Nababan, Dian Latifiani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
.png)
