The Compliance Of Autonomous Weapons To International Humanitarian Law: Question Of Law And Question Of Fact


  • Rina Shahrullah Universitas Internasional Batam
  • Muhammad Samsu Saputra Universitas Internasional Batam



nternational Humanitarian Law, Autonomous Weapons, Armed Conflicts


International Humanitarian Law (IHL) sets the rules to prevent human from doing excessive damages upon humanity in the time of war or armed conflicts. However, a new weapon which is called autonomous weapons rises a serious concern today because it can search, detect, identify, select, track and engage targets without human interventions. This study aims to clarify which weapons are  regarded as “autonomous” today in order to  find out whether the present autonomous weapons comply the IHL principles. This study adopts normative legal research.  The data types used is based on secondary data which consist of Primary legal materials, namely the Geneva Convention 1949 and its Additional Protocols. In addition, secondary legal materials are used to support the primary legal materials are obtained from articles and books.  The data is collected through library research and analyzed by using a qualitative-descriptive approach. It finds that a weapon system which limits human control and intervention, is not automatically classified as an autonomous weapon due to the level of human and AI engagement in the weapon. The use of autonomous weapon in armed conflicts does not entirely fulfill the principles of IHL, particularly a fully autonomous weapon because it will never satisfy the principle of distinction, proportionality, the prohibition of attack against those hors de combat and humanity.


Antoine A. Bouvier, “International Humanitarian Law and the Law of Armed Conflict”

Peace Operations Training Institute,” Second edition, (December 2012).

Hui Min Huang, “Autonomy Levels For Unmanned Systems (ALFUS) Framework” NIST,

(11 June 2017).

International Committee Of The Red Cross, “What is international humanitarian law?”

ICRC, (31 December 2014).

Gillian Brockell, Wahington Post, January 9, 2020 “Iran’s president reminded the

world that the U.S. mistakenly shot down an airliner. Now, Iran is suspected of

doing the same”,

Global Security.Org, Samsung Techwin SGR-A1 Sentry Guard Robot,

Human Rights Watch, “Precedent for Preemption: The Ban on Blinding Lasers as a

Model for a Killer Robots Prohibition”,

Lelouche Nataniel, et al., “iCLEAN – Loitering Attack UCAV” Technion Institute of

Technology, (2012).

Marine Corps Warfighting Publications, “MAGTF Anti Armor Operations,” Chapter 2,

Marines, (2 August 2016).

Neil Davidson, “A legal perspective: Autonomous weapon systems under international

humanitarian law” ICRC, (31 January 2018).

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, “Penelitian Hukum” Jakarta Kencana, (2005).

Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Mamuji, “Penelitian Hukum Normative Suatu Tinjauan

Singkat” PT Raja Grafindo Persada, (2003).

Ty McCormick, “Lethal Autonomy: A Short History”

United Nations decision to announce arms embargo and economic sanctions on the

Federal Republic of Yugoslavia because of the excessive force used by

government to destroy the terrorism act. United Nations Security Council

Resolution 1160 (1998).

Vincent Boulanin and Maaike Verbruggen, “Mapping The Development Of Autonomy InWeapon Systems” Researchgate, (November 2017).

Zainuddin Ali, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika (2016)


PlumX Metrics



How to Cite

Shahrullah, R., & Samsu Saputra, M. . (2022). The Compliance Of Autonomous Weapons To International Humanitarian Law: Question Of Law And Question Of Fact. Wacana Hukum, 28(1), 8–17.