GREEN OPEN SPACE PLANNING OF SURAKARTA CITY

Based On Surakarta City Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2021 Concerning Surakarta City Spatial Plan 2021-2041

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the spatial planning of Surakarta City based on Surakarta City Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2021 concerning Surakarta City Spatial Plan 2021-2041 on the Procurement of Proportional Green Open Space in Surakarta. Reviewing and analyzing what obstacles occur in the spatial planning of Surakarta City based on Surakarta City Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2021 concerning Surakarta City Spatial Plan 2021-2041 on the Procurement of Proportional Green Open Space in Surakarta.
The problem of spatial planning policy in Surakarta City is the decreasing availability of green open space. This is one of the impacts of the form of physical development that is carried out continuously using green open space.
The method of approach in this writing is sociological juridical. The specifics of this study use descriptive. The data source uses primary data and skunder data. Data collection techniques use interview studies and document studies. To analyze the data, researchers use qualitative descriptive analysis methods.
The spatial planning of Surakarta City based on Surakarta City Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2021 concerning the Surakarta City Spatial Plan 2021-2041 on the Procurement of Proportional Green Open Space in Surakarta has been implemented well but has not been able to obtain maximum results, where the number of RTH in Solo City in total has met the minimum limit according to applicable regulations, which is 30% of the city area, however, proportions are not ideal due to the lack of Public RTH in Surakarta City. The proportion of RTH in Surakarta City is still not ideal due to several obstacles, namely the limited number of public lands, private sector support for the provision of RTH and low public awareness about green open spaces. These obstacles have been anticipated by the Surakarta City Government by carrying out several policies, namely: Purchase of Private Land and set aside building land for Private RTH. The policy has not run optimally due to limited budgets for private land purchases, and public awareness of the importance of ecological development in an urban area.
Keywords: Spatial Planning, Green Open Space.