IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERTANAHAN MELALUI MEDIASI DI KANTOR PERTANAHAN KOTA SURAKARTA

Abstract

Sri Suharsih, 2016. “Implementation of Land Dispute Resolulation Policy
through Mediation in Land Office of Surakarta Urban Government”. Slamet
Riyadi University Surakarta, Thesis, unpublished.
This research objective was to describe the land dispute resolution through
mediation at Land Office in Surakarta Urban Government. Descriptive
qualitative research strategy was used in this study to approach the research
objectives. The respondents were selected on the basis of purposive
sampling. In doing so, the respondents were Land Office officers, those who
were disputes, and the community members.The data was collected by using
interview technique and document study as well. Research results indicated
that dispute resolutions were solved according to the existing regulations. The
fulfilled element in dispute resolution was through the mediation.
Implementation of the Goverment Regulation number 3 the year of 2011 on
the Management, Investigation and Handling on the Land Cases analysed
according to Edward III theory, discovered that there were four interrelated
variables. Those four variables were communication, human resource,
disposition, and bureaucratic structure. Research results indicated that
communication variable effectively worked between the facilitator or mediator
on the one hand and those who disputed. Dealing with the human resource,
research result showed that although there was lack of man power, but the
existing limited qualified staffs were competent to do their duties and they
were also able to finish their duties according to timeline. Implementer of
disposition implemented the activities according to the Surakarta Urban
Government Land Office’ guidance. Related to bureaucratic structure,
research result showed that the bureaucratic stucture contributed a lot in
succeeding the policy implementation. The obstacles that the implementors
faced was the time constraint to resolve the disputes through mediation since
they have to make mutual aggreement between both who were in the situation
of conflict. In this case, the mediators had no authority to decide.
Key words: Communication; human resource; disposition; bureaucratic structure;
disputes; mediation.
1. Pendahuluan